当前位置: 首页  > 股票分析 > 港股分析

Tencent (700 HK) - Game for Peace, a long-waited chicken dinner

2019/5/10 6:10:52 来源:招商证券 作者: 人评论

作者:Leo LIU,Matt MA时光:2019年05月09日重要性:普通报告行业评级:公司评级:相干股票代码:浏览权限: 该文章钻石卡、金卡、银卡客户可浏览全文摘要:Report title:Tencent (700 HK) - Game for Peace, a long-waited chicken dinner Analyst:Leo LIU,Matt MA Rep…

作者: Leo LIU,Matt MA
时光: 2019年05月09日
重要性: 普通报告
行业评级:
公司评级:
相干股票代码:
浏览权限:   该文章钻石卡、金卡、银卡客户可浏览全文
摘要: Report title:Tencent (700 HK) - Game for Peace, a long-waited chicken dinner
Analyst:Leo LIU,Matt MA
Report type:Company
Date:20190509
[Summary]

■ Tencent launched PUBG alike game “Game for Peace”(战争精英)
■ User migration should be smooth with limited MT monetization
■ Maintain BUY with TP at HK$423
What happened? On May 8, Tencent launched the open beta test for its new mobile game called Game for Peace (GP), a battle royale game which has already received the license from SAPPRFT. Meanwhile, servers for its two battle royale games, PUBG Mobile and PUBG Full Ahead were closed. With direct inherited account system and social relations from PUBG Mobile, it’s clear that GP is Tencent’s replacement for PUBG titles to fulfill regulatory requirements. Although most features of GP, such as game engines, graphics, in-game items, UI etc, are almost identical to PUBG Mobile, the main differences lie in core values and visual effects. In GP, previous survival target has been replaced with military drill background. The last man standing value was diminished by allowing last five players to win, so that team collaboration is stressed over individual winning. Moreover, in-game visual effects such as blood spilling and shrinking toxic gas circle were also modified, along with a friendly waving of goodbye after being eliminated. All of these changes provide gamers with a more harmonious and relaxing vibe. These improvements combined with the new 16+ system, which more strictly prevent gamers under 16 from playing, reflected Tencent’s determination to carry out its new mission of Tech for Social Good.
Our view The aggressive approach of directly stopping the operations of existing two popular PUBG games showed Tencent’s urgent will to start driving revenue from battle royale genre, despite the risk of losing certain portion of gamers during user migration. To some extent, this also reflected Tencent's strong confidence in game quality and ease of user migration. Through direct app update (Android users can directly update their PUBG mobile to GP without new installation), effective promotional channels, and attractive in-game incentives, we believe it should be relatively easy for Tencent to migrate majority of the high value users in ST. We also believe there will be a monetization burst (over RMB 1bn grossing) in the first month after launch, thanks to the accumulated spending willingness from the long testing PUBG titles. However, given in-game item purchasing is the sole monetization method at current stage; midterm monetization could be limited, as gamers in battle royale genre generally lack adequate scenarios and willingness to show-off skins and items. In the LT, we think seasonal subscriptions like the royale pass system in PUBG mobile would be a better model for GP to reach its monetization peak. Tencent introduced the royale pass system in PUBG mobile overseas version since June 2018, and its revenue has tripled soon after that. For the whole industry, the successful launch of GP has grand positive meaning, as it has set up an example helping game companies to better understand the borderlines of game license approval standards after resumption.
Maintain BUY; with TP HK$423
We conservatively estimate that GP will bring in RMB4-5bn incremental grossing in 2019, given 1) differences in game contents; 2) sole item-based monetization system; 3) stricter 16+ system; and 4) user migration ramp-up time. We maintain BUY rating with TP of HK$423 unchanged, and would wait for 1Q19 earnings to get more info. Tencent is trading at 34x FY19E P/E vs. 27x historical avg P/E.

[投资评级界说]

公司短期评级

以报告日起6个月内,公司股价相对同期市场基准(沪深300指数)的表示为尺度:激烈引荐:公司股价涨幅超基准指数20%以上
谨慎引荐:公司股价涨幅超基准指数5-20%之间
中性:公司股价更改幅度相对基准指数介于±5%之间
回避:公司股价表示弱于基准指数5%以上

公司长期评级
A:公司长期竞争力高于行业均匀程度
B:公司长期竞争力与行业均匀程度分歧
C:公司长期竞争力低于行业均匀程度

[重要声明]
报告中的内容和看法仅供参考,并不组成对所述证券买卖的出价,在任何情形下,本报告中的信息或所表述的看法并不组成对任何人的投资建议。

相关资讯

    暂无相关的数据...

共有条评论 网友评论

验证码: 看不清楚?